4

xf86-video-intel and friends

view full story
linux-howto

https://bbs.archlinux.org – karol wrote:http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra … intel-uxa/ says it replaces xf86-video-intel https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … 7b4c6c384f so it will be installed after you update your system.You can install the -sna version via 'pacman -S xf86-video-intel-sna' if you prefer it.But, oddly, this isn't how it seems to be working. I've updated the system. The new packages are there. The old package is also there. And pacman doesn't see the old one as in need of replacing or updating. I am using 64 bit but the -uxa package says exactly the same as it does (HowTos)

Shoutmeloud's picture
Submitted by Shoutmeloud on 07/04/2012 – Made popular on 07/04/2012

Stories similar to xf86-video-intel and friends

Yup.* Introducing split -sna and -uxa accel methods: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … cd5ac33f4f* unifying them: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … 0f21bfb8ccwith some "interesting" changes to the PKGBUILD in between ;PIf OP run 'pacman -Syu xf86-video-intel' and has no ignored package in pacman.conf he should be fine now.

karol https://bbs.archlinux.or

Are you using 32 or 64 bit? I thought packages starting "lib32-" were for multilib stuff but maybe I'm wrong.Try replacing xf86-video-driver with xf86-video-intel.Try replacing lib32-intel-dri with intel-dri.

cfr https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54639

2012-06-03T00:00:32Z

This is what I seeOpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Ironlake Mobile My laptop has integrated graphics, I've installed xf86-video-ati xf86-video-intel and xf86-video-vesa

seniorsassycat https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=51752

2012-04-16T13:14:49Z

Wait for 1.41-2 to be available on your mirrors or install it by hand. It may fix the conflict: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … 47774c5870If it does not, open a bug report.Edit: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/31755 says 1.41-2 fixes this.

karol https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=25522

2012-10-01T20:12:49Z

Seems like the ifplugd.action script has been removed and is now removed by the PKGBUILD file :-/https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … 0365ea7e33https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … es/ifplugd

JamieKitson https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=43401

2012-09-18T20:32:22Z

I had another crash, but this time when simply browsing via Firefox. Spent a bit of time looking through logs but no luck. Then decided to try downgrading packages from the last update (see OP). Tried xorg-server and xorg-server-common first. Resulted in X not starting ("no screen found"), so I upgraded them again. Then downgraded xf86-video-intel which solved everything.

Here is a reduced list of packages not installed, system still operating correctly.# pacman -Syu resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts...

Targets (5): xf86-input-evdev-2.7.3-2 xf86-video-savage-2.3.6-2 xf86-video-vesa-2.3.2-2 xorg-server-1.13.0-2 xorg-server-common-1.13.0-2

zorro https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54388

2012-10-14T17:19:59Z

This file is provided by the filesystem package, you can grab it from https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … filesystemSeems similar to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=148162

karol https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=25522

2012-10-03T04:03:01Z

hadrons123 wrote:1. Use code tags. https://bbs.archlinux.org/help.php#bbcode2.