EDIT: Fixed my console font, got my internet drivers working, got xmonad up and running, dmenu runs fine.It's been a good day and I'm glad with what I've done on my first proper day with Linux. Although I think I'm going to go back to Debian barebones/no DE or just dive head in with Arch. Arch looks like a challenge and I'm well up for fixing some stuff.
I am setting up a lightweight server for minecraft using Debian Testing and when I use "apt-get install openbox" or "aptitude install openbox" I am met with 731MB of dependencies. I knew this wasn't right but I tried installing it anyway and it installed Gnome 3.8 with openbox replacing the default wm.
comicosmos wrote:I would prefer to launch openbox rather than openbox-session.Yes, we know, and we showed you how to do it in your topic. You didn't need to bump a [solved] topic from last year to tell us again.
tetris4 wrote:am glad to hear you got it fixed.I will do this for you now, but in the future you can mark a thread as solved by editing your first post and adding [solved] to the title. Will do, didn't see a way of editing the post title but will do from now on
I've noticed a lot of members have switched over to xfce with an openbox feel on debian testing via omn's DTX.If we assume for a minute that #! becomes a debian testing build for the next release, there is also a chance it may switch to XFCE.So my question is, what are the differences between openbox and xfce, with regards to performance?Even if #!