Upgrade of /etc/group and /etc/gshadow

This thread could do with a more informative title.  Please edit it and mark as solved.

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2013-03-23T13:52:01Z

OK, I provided the link just in case.  Is there any improvement with 2.20.12-1?

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2012-10-20T20:43:16Z

It is fixed please ensure you mark the thread as [solved].

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2012-11-20T11:49:18Z

What is actually going wrong?  What have you done and what are the errors?

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2012-11-08T08:39:50Z

Together with being marked solved this thread would benefit greatly from having a descriptive title.

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2013-02-03T08:30:29Z

I think you may be better off asking this question here:http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv6/raspberry-pi

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2012-11-10T09:01:54Z

PaulBx1 wrote:Looks like it moves the "lock" group to a different place in the list (who knows why)https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit … &showmsg=1

WorMzy https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=38091

2012-08-23T22:03:12Z

You could have just manually created /run/httpd/httpd.pid

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2012-10-29T13:55:46Z

Malvineous wrote: ... I don't think I am using systemd ...It's easy enough to check:$ cat /proc/1/comm systemdPlus if you are still using initscripts won't you have noticed things gradually not working as expected, unless you are maintaining them yourself somehow?

loafer https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=24939

2013-01-29T11:51:23Z