1

Systemd opposed to init?

view story
linux-howto

http://crunchbanglinux.org – Should upcoming releases of Crunchbang come shipped with Systemd installed by default rather than init? The more I read about systemd, the more I think it is suited for Crunchbang over the existing init scripts. I realize the Systemd program does not necessarily conform to the KISS standard, but it is also supposedly much more efficient. I myself will be testing it out on one machine just to see if it increases performances at all.What do you guys think? I may learn something here too :) (HowTos)

ziyi's picture
Submitted by ziyi on 10/14/2012

Stories similar to Systemd opposed to init?

Where is all my RAM going? 9 weeks 6 days ago

systemd doesn't eat much RAM here.

Separate /usr and systemd 30 weeks 2 days ago

Hi,I carefully updated to systemd but I cannot boot now.1) It wrote me: "Cannot find /sbin/init". Solved, I added "init=/bin/systemd" to kernel line in grub.Now it writes me "Cannot find systemd". Reason is that /bin/systemd is symlink to /usr/lib/systemd/systemd and my /usr is on separate partition which is not mounted at that moment.Thanks for any help.Blaazen

systemd startup issues 33 weeks 10 hours ago

Odd, there is no (nor should there be) any /boot/systemd.Are you by chance at the point where you add "init=/bin/systemd" to your bootloader kernel line?  Could you have made a typo and put init=/boot/systemd?  Or perhaps if you didn't put any path to systemd *perhaps* /boot/ would be inferred as that may be the current working directory when init is called.(edit: beat by

Starting Services in Systemd 33 weeks 2 days ago

I have written some software for my company which needs to come up in the background whenever the machine reboots. I have been accomplishing this by placing the standard System V style init script in /etc/init.d and then creating links to the rc.d directories - in other words, the standard SysV init method. The program itself doesn't fork a daemon or anything like that.

Systemd 203 Brings New Switches 2 weeks 15 hours ago

systemd, a system and service manager for Linux, compatible with SysV and LSB init scripts, that provides aggressive parallelization capabilities and uses socket and D-Bus activation for starting services, is now at version 203.

systemd 203 has been released with a fair amount of changes, but there is nothing out of the ordinary.

Highlights of systemd 203:

• systemd-nspawn will now create

ok at my testnot work .... init=/{usr/bin,bin}/systemd ... rowork...

I am writing a C++ program. I am developing on Fedora, but it will be run on a wide variety of distros. At some point, it needs to restart the network. Before the advent of systemd, one would have issued the command:

/etc/init.d/network restart

or perhaps

/etc/init.d/networking restart

I have noticed that on some systemd systems, the network is implemented through NetworkManager.

I recently purchased a Brother DCP-7065DN printer. In the process of setting it up as a network printer under a pure systemd install. The wiki article about setting it up is for rc.d not systemd.

hi guys,i got it: https://www.archlinux.org/news/consolek … by-logind/my system worked in a initscripts/systemd mix. i already configured the DAEMONS...etc.