1

Sudo installation upon initial install

view story
linux-howto

https://bbs.archlinux.org – And be sure you have done "pacman -Syu" first, or at the very least "pacman -Sy".Edit: my comment is probably not relevant if you made it up to this point of the install already - I assume you successfully installed other things like a bootloader.  I suspect this is a networking issue.  Can you ping the mirrors? Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694 2012-10-21T21:31:24Z (HowTos)

Danial's picture
Submitted by Danial on 10/21/2012

Stories similar to Sudo installation upon initial install

pacman-key unable to execute 9 weeks 9 hours ago

adubschavy, you mark your own threads as solved, when you feel they are, by clicking "edit" on your first post which allows you to edit the title and prepend "[Solved]"

Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694

2013-03-22T16:08:50Z

A fresh start 25 weeks 6 days ago

It would be the same as `pacman -Ss base` plus `pacman -Ss base-devel`.  Note "-Ssq" would probably be much more useful in this context.

Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694

2012-11-25T01:38:42Z

How to Determine which Package 44 weeks 4 days ago

?? I think I am missing something: every one of those entries says "... is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1" right?Why are you googling to figure our which package owns those files when pacman just told you?

Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694

2012-07-16T12:01:32Z

Nope.  Many "AUR helpers" do this though.  In my limited experience yaourt seems to be one that handles this seemlessly, but I'd say it comes with some costs of hiding what is doing from the user.

Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694

2012-09-20T17:48:41Z

Those should both be fine.  I'm not familiar with all those "initializing built-in extension" lines you get from starting X.  It could well be my ignorance of something basic that I have just not had the occasion to see before, but as it is different, it piques my curiosity as to whether those initializations could be relevant to the problem.

Trilby https://bbs.ar

In this case I'm pretty sure it can't make a difference, but for future reference, pacman != yaourt.  Your title says one thing, but your content says another.

Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694

2013-01-29T00:44:09Z

gigal,Thanks for the examples.  Sorry if I assumed it was a simple issue ... most issues are.  But these seem well written and nothing jumps out at me that would be of use.To answer part of your initial question, one difference between the two situations (manually running the bash script vs.

From where?  Tty: type "exit" or Ctl-D.  From X: use your WM/DE's commands.

Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694

2012-11-04T23:47:01Z

Pacman Missing From Install 9 weeks 5 days ago

I stand corrected, on my correction.  So it does sound like an initramfs environment.

Trilby https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694

2013-03-18T01:41:55Z