7

[SOLVED] is it a bug or not on at command

view full story
linux-howto

http://www.linuxquestions.org – please see the blow testing Quote: -bash-3.2$ at -t "2010-02-05 13:37:20" at> at at> ls at> <EOT> job 11 at 2010-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ at -t "2010-02-05 13:37:20" at> ls at> <EOT> job 12 at 2010-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ at -t "2010-02-05 13:37:20" at> ls at> <EOT> job 13 at 2010-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ at 13:50 at> ls at> <EOT> job 14 at 2010-02-05 13:50 -bash-3.2$ at -t "2011-02-05 13:37:20" at> ls at> <EOT> job 15 at 2011-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ -bash-3.2$ date Fri Feb 5 13:44:21 CST 2010 -bash-3.2$ at -t "2011-02-05 13:37" at> ls at> <EOT> job 16 at 2011-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ -bash-3.2$ at -t "2011-02-05 12:37" at> ls at> <EOT> job 17 at 2011-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ at -t "2011-02-05 12:37" at> ls at> <EOT> job 18 at 2011-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ -bash-3.2$ at -t "12:37 2011-02-05" Garbled time -bash-3.2$ at -t "2011-02-05 11:11" at> ls at> <EOT> job 19 at 2011-01-02 00:05 -bash-3.2$ at -t "2011-02-15 11:11" at> ls at> <EOT> job 20 at 2011-01-01 23:05 -bash-3.2$ at -t "2011-03-15 11:11" at> ls at> <EOT> job 21 at 2011-01-02 23:05 -bash-3.2$ -bash-3.2$ at -t "2010-03-01 01:01" at> ls at> <EOT> job 22 at 2010-01-03 00:01 -bash-3.2$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.3 (Final) -bash-3.2$ uname -r 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5.028stab066.10 now I upgrade the OS to Centos 5.4. but the issue is pertinacity. Quote: #rpm -qa|grep ^at at-3.1.8-82.fc6 #uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5.028stab066.10 #1 SMP Sat Dec 12 18:52:53 MSK 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I checked it on three virutal box on three difference really machine. I am not sure that is a but or I made some mistake. should be at [[CC]YY]MMDDhhmm (HowTos)