14

Redhat Philosophy and Slackware Philosophy differences

view full story
linux-howto

https://www.centos.org – Hi I am interested in free version of RHEL and appreciate CentOS for this.I am however pretty much would first like to understand the Redhat Philosophy better before diving too deep. I ... [by mercury305] (Distributions)

xfrk's picture
Submitted by xfrk on 07/14/2012 – Made popular on 07/14/2012

Stories similar to Redhat Philosophy and Slackware Philosophy differences

Slackware's developers expect you to have a brain. RH, unfortunately, seems to be going more and more towards a Fedora audience, that is, the less experienced destkop user. Note... [by scottro]

Panhandling? 28 weeks 2 days ago

what happened to the ubuntu philosophy? free and always free for the people of earth,hehehe i just went this morning for a clean download since i've been using daily distro for ever and saw a pandling hand asking for money.has mark fallen this low? or is ubu going comercial? huh,soon i'll see a license fee as Xandro or RedHat.....

What the argument over the names often boils down to is philosophy, not just attribution or credit. GNU was created with software freedom in mind. Linux, in its genesis, was proprietary until it adopted the GNU GPL licence and then became mainstream.

They may be bitter rivals in the operating system stakes, but Microsoft has openly praised “the Apple design philosophy” in its new release of Office for Mac.

Continent Can Draw From the Ubuntu Philosophy to Increase Its Democracy Despite the several decades dedicated to trying and testing the mechanics of democracy in Africa, there appears be so small to account for much better leadership or greater nevertheless much better high quality life for the African citizen. From Cape Town in the South [...]

I have registered with redhat but unable to get the iso files for redhat 6 or later.

As far as my understanding goes, Redhat desktop edition is free and they charge you for support( correct me if i m wrong).

Which one is best for learning purpose? Is a choice of redhat 6 good or shall i stick with redhat 5?

The customer always comes first.

I've using Debian since 2010 for some home purposes and it has been stable. Is Debian still a good option if I need a server for heavy network, cpu, disk and memory usage?

Last month I listened to some admins say that RedHat is the most stable in bulk operations and that CentOS is a free version of RHEL. Their opinion is that CentOS is the best free distro.

The RHEL v5 SRPM repo still lists