Rawhide only deserves partially the fame of "bleeding edg". It has packages that they seem not to be having adequada maintenance and are obsolete. Lamentable.
on 02/23/2013 – Made popular on 02/23/2013
* I am currently attempting to upgrade from Fedora 19 to Rawhide. Yum is still still at the "Package and Processing Dependency" stage, it is taking forever with over 3,100 updates. I have never used it before and I do understand what it is, what problems might happen, etc.
I have a new Fedora Rawhide/f22.x86_64 VirtualBox VM and I've installed the guest additions in the standard, distro-agnostic manner. Unfortunately, the installer does not recognize the current installed Xorg (it's too recent), and refuses to install the X Windows System Drivers. How can I force the installation or find a version which recognizes it correctly?
The much-anticipated split between the Fedora "Rawhide" development repository and the stabilizing Fedora 13 repository has happened at last. That means that people continuing to follow Rawhide should fasten their seat belts and update their backups in anticipation of a flood of packages inte...
No.Such is the nature of an Enterprise distribution, the idea is that you get thoroughly tested packages and not the bleeding edge. If you want bleeding edge packages then CentOS is not... [by TrevorH]
I started with Fedora release versions and after a while found that Arch linux releases packages faster than fedora and so I moved to Arch linux for a while, but then recently I found Rawhide is as usable as one can imagine. There are some minor performance issues, but those are not showstoppers. But previously rawhide was almost unusable.