RaLink RT3090

In the following program though most of the working part of the program is commented out, it gives seg fault. reducing the value of MAX to say 10000 removes the seg fault. Why is this happening? it should be only 1 MB only. Is 1 MB too big for an array?

#include <stdio.h>

#define MAX 1000010

int main() {

Hello,

I run F12. Since some days my laptop has become very sluggish. In Mozilla, switching between the tabs takes like seconds instead of fraction of a second. Also minimizing and mximizing windows takes long. Switching between the windows too takes long. Now I can't see the cursor while typing this post.

Greetings,

Suppose we have this piece of code, on Linux/i686 (my machine is Slackware Linux 13.1, 32 bit):

Code: char sc[]=                /* 24 bytes                      */    "\x31\xc0"            /* xorl    %eax,%eax   

Code: Kernel  71.0  |####################      |  Reads    12532  Rawin        0 User    17.5  |######                      |  Writes    1179  Ttyout    1376 Wait    10.0  |####       

I believe I have too many old kernels and would like to remove a few of them. What is the best way do do this?

Here is the output of rpm -qa | grep kerenel:

public static boolean rentCar(String id) {                         for (int i = 0; i < collection.size(); i++) {                                 return(

Hi, can somebody help my by explaining someting in a patch file?

Code: @@ -761,6 +768,26 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {                 .proc_handler        = proc_dointvec,         },  #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BFS +        {

Dear All,

I have file : input.txt

Code: HANDVEL 2201181                                                1000      180      19      1540    173    1581    316    1652    509&n

Experts, Can you please help how to get the output that are written just below "bad"

Code: calls                  badcalls                nullrecv                439486                  54    &nbsp