That's the one I am using, it works when the output_to_x is enabled, but when that is disabled it doesn't.
bslackr
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=56505
2012-09-25T08:45:26Z
I have the following setup:
M1 = Master 1
S1 = Slave 1
S2 = Slave 2
S3 = Slave 3
Where all slaves are replicating directly from M1. I would like to move S2 and S3 to be slaves of S1.
I'm not sure about how to do it without any downtime and with replication picking up where it left off.
Just tried it, and it didn't work Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./serman", line 161, in <module>
main()
File "./serman", line 86, in main
newly_enabled = checked - enabled
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'enabled' referenced before assignment
bslackr
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=56505
2012-11-26T03:02:16Z
I currently have a master db server (lets call it db1) and 6 slaves (slave1-6). I've setup a new server (db2) as a slave of db1 and it's in sync.
Use code blocks. I am not an awesome user... I am rather lame actually.... so I cannot help you I don't think.This may be off putting to some though:I use Windows 95....err, I mean Arch with Awesome WM with urxvt.
WonderWoofy
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=60312
2012-10-06T23:43:00Z
"instance" doesn't mean what you think it does: http://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/FAQ#Ho … tifiers.3FThere is no clean way (in general) to get the process responsible for a window due to the way Xorg works (you can have multiple windows from multiple computers).
Stebalien
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=36461
2013-02-17T01:11:16Z
Maybe it is a timing issue. Can you have awesome run wmname and syndaemon? It is able to run apps when it starts.https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Aw … n_programshttps://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Autostart
2ManyDogs
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=56078
2012-09-14T23:33:39Z
Is this possible without having to dump to all other slaves at the same time?
Basically I would create a blank database with the 'create database' function on the master and slave. Then I would setup the replication of the DB.
I would then do a dump on the master.. would all the inserts during the dump be replicated to the slave?
TIA!
edit: sorry i didn't mean mysqldump..
fallen1011 wrote:what has changed since the AWM i used back like a yr ago that makes this no longer workA lot. See here for most of the required config changes:http://awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Awesome_3.4_to_3.5
tdy
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=21392
2013-01-22T00:40:24Z