OP doesn't mean that the package is out-of-date, OP means that the PKGBUILD in the AUR apparently only has a build function (no package function), which is deprecated.grimpirate, that does not constitute a reason to flag out-of-date, it constitutes a reason to send the AUR package maintainer a request to update the PKGBUILD to reflect modern syntax.
While Trying to install VirtualBox from AUR, and when installing the dependencies, I got this error.
==> Starting build()...
/tmp/yaourt-tmp-keripix/aur-libpng12/libpng12/./PKGBUILD: line 26: patch: command not found
==> ERROR: Build Failed.
Aborting...
Error: Makepkg was unable to build libpng12 package.
It was solved by install base-devel package
Ok, here is one thing that puzzles me... I'm trying to build a package from source, and then use checkinstall to generate a .deb package.
Try a makepkg -s on it to see if there are any packages not in the official repo. Than check ccr to see if they are there. Otherwise search for individual parts of the package name; for example, many of the python packages in chakra use python2-something while arch uses python-something. If you find a matching package under a different name, change it in the PKGBUILD.
hugleo,Make your changes in the 09_xen config (XEN_HYPERVISOR_CMDLINE and XEN_LINUX_CMDLINE) as this is the file provided by the xen package. However looking at the PKGBUILD of the xen package it doesnt look like it does anything with the 09_xen file when an update happens. You will either need to add it yourself (to the backups or whatever) or ask the maintainer to update the pkgbuild.
Trying to build a package that includes curl/types.h which has been removed from the curl package, but every time I comment out the include and run makepkg -e it re-extracts from the source file and overwrites my changes anyway. I thought the entire point of the -e option was to use the existing src/ directory as-is?
I wonder if anybody would be prepared to take a look at this orphaned AUR package. I've posted a comment on the package's page at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnofract4d/.Basically, I managed to get the latest version of the package to build just by changing the checksums and adjusting the version but I would like to get the documentation to compile as well.
Hi!After an interesting discussion on HackerNews about RethinkBD, I wanted to take a look for myself. Using it in Ubuntu (my work system) wasn't that bad, they build package for that one, and looked like something I might like to play with.
In order to test whether it would build and run if built against amule-daemon only, you would need to make a separate PKGBUILD for that as it's included in the amule package (as usr/bin/amuled) in the Arch repos. The AUR kamule PKGBUILD has amule as a dependency so you would need to change that to the new amuled or amule-daemon package.