I have a django app running on Nginx and uwsgi.
I have a "hello world" fastcgi running on 127.0.0.1:9000 and would like to serve it via nginx.
I have set up Nginx as a reverse proxy to Apache on a web server.
Nginx is listening on 0.0.0.0:80 and passing through to 127.0.0.1:81
This all seems to be working fine, except when I first load the site at the root level (i.e.
I am running into an odd problem for which I am not sure if it is a configuration issue or a bug in nginx. My setup is a nginx reverse proxy which has Apache2 backend servers. The load balancer is pretty basic similar to the example from the wiki, e.g.
My plateform is a reverse proxy with nginx and a web site on IIS.
I have a 502 error with nginx.
2013/01/22 12:19:03 [error] 3842#0: *37 recv() failed (104: Connection reset by peer) while reading response header from upstream, client: 10.142.1.72, server: www.mydomaine.com, request: "GET /MosStyle/aspx/arboStyle.aspx?style=irlande&refDossierStyle=../../MosData/MosStyle/styles/irlande/ HTTP/
I have the following set up:
nginx as reverse proxy
apache (with passenger) for serving content
Now I have simple Sinatra application and the following happens if I try to access different things:
domain.com/hi - Sinatra says me Hi as was coded
domain.com/readme.txt (static file) - it is fetched correctly from the 'public_html' folder by nginx
And finally - domain.com/ or domain.com - 403 er
I get the follow error in the nginx log
[error] 17734#0: *6643 recv() failed (104: Connection reset by peer)
while reading response header from upstream, client: [cut],
server: [cut], request: "GET /venues HTTP/1.1", upstream:
"fastcgi://127.0.0.1:9000", host: "[cut]"
I have a dedicated box with 8 gb ram, quad core chip.
I have a server set on a VPS serving up a production Rails app via Nginx + Unicorn.
Nginx is an HTTP and reverse proxy server famous for its slick performance. A few days back, the people behind the Nginx project decided to form a company and thus set standards for all their operations. Nginx is not as popular as Apache but it is indeed a better option than Apache if you want peak performance and can manage the correct setup.