Netctl treating identical profiles differently?

view story

https://bbs.archlinux.org – If this is the case, is there any reason whya). it is not documented in the netctl or netctl.profile manpage?b). the interface name is also required within the file?c). it attempts to use an apparently hardcoded default interface instead of failing?I really think having to specify the interface in the filename is an unnecessary inconvenience if it's already in the contents of the file. The whole point of me renaming it was to avoid having to type a nonsensical string of characters. The facts that this is undocumented and that the most common case (in which the correct interface is already (HowTos)