The patch file and the source files that the patch modifies should be in same directory. For dwm, I have found that installing via AUR is more trouble than it's worth. I have the source files of dwm in $HOME and just run make clean install inside this directory whenever I modify my config.h
iTwenty
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=43530
2011-12-06T15:05:54Z
The diff you use rename tile() to ntile(), you should not have tile in your config.h. The rest of errors probably relate to what the diff has nerfed.I think you should stay on 5.8.2 until all the patches have support for 5.9 if you can't patch on patch on your own.
livibetter
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=16513
2011-09-12T14:49:19Z
Because of the way the PKGBUILD is written.cat "$srcdir/"*.patch | patch -Np1Old patches in $srcdir will be applied if you haven't cleaned them out.
falconindy
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=30251
2012-07-01T01:17:19Z
tomd123 wrote:I figured out a way to avoid the segfault, you will have to rebuild vim from abs and apply the following patch to the PKGBUILD:https://gist.github.com/2423572I'm guessing this has something to do with arch's and vim's buildflags somehow not playing well together.This works with patch 496 and fixes python 3 support for me. Thanks a lot.
saline
https://bbs
Mediator - please don't spoonfeed posters. As has been pointed out, this topic is extensively documented and, as a quick search will show, has been answered on these boards many times before...SuperhackerDaru - I'm closing this.
I can create a patch for a file with the following:
Code:
diff -uN OldFile NewFile > patch.txt
then apply the patch with:
Code:
patch OldFile < patch.txt
I tried this with directories:
Code:
diff -uN OldDirectory NewDirectory > patch.txt
it seemed to work fine. Then I tried to apply the patch:
Save the above to a file where your PKGBUILD file is. We'll call it uzbl.patch. Then cd to that directory and run "patch -p1 < uzbl.patch"Don't see why that wouldn't work (to patch the file I mean).
dodo3773
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=47076
2012-09-11T05:36:55Z
Yes: I think the suckless crew regard EWMH as some sort of abomination
jasonwryan
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=25579
2012-08-23T09:29:53Z
hooya wrote:I don't even know where to start to fix this.https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_ConfigurationThere are also a number of threads post the recent upgrade with some very good information in them...
jasonwryan
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=25579
2012-09-08T02:52:13Z