I have heard people say "oh that server is off the load balancer so you can run that expensive script on it".
What implications does a server off the load balancer have? Fundamental to answering this, I understand load balancing, but I don't know what the dynamics of a system with 5 servers (4 on the load balancer) has.
Thanks
I am using ldirectord for loadbalancing two HTTP servers. On the load balancer box i have the following network configuration:
eth0 is used for internal purposes and does not take part in load balancing at all. On eth1
I have configured the public IP for the machine (for accessses from other internal networks) and the VIP of the load balancer.
Efficient High-Available LoadBalanced Cluster On CentOS 5.3 (Direct Routing Method)
Hello to all Server fault users,
I am new to this website but have constantly been using the mother website, stackover flow.
Well to begin with, i would like to design a load balancer for the organization i am working for.
As i am very new to this whole, idea about load balancing and networks.
We are using aws load-balancer. There is one machine which is behind the load balancer. So for this reason we have configured apache2.conf such that %h are replaced by %{X-Forwarded-For}i in our file.
But something wired is happening. We can't see any ip of the client in the logs section.
But when we change back from %{X-Forwarded-For}i to %h all client ip's are visible in the log section.
We have a aws load balancer. The load balancer uses the TCP connections 443 to encrypt the data.
Since the load balancer encrypts the IP of the client, in our apache log file we can see only the IP of the load balancer rather then the client. Even though we have used %{X-Forwarded-For}i in our log format.
Is there any way to handle this issue?
I'm setting up a load balancer with failover and I'm confused on how to properly set it up. The load-balancer is balancing web traffic to web-servers on a LAN network.
My setup is the following:
I have one incoming external IP address, that ethernet cable goes to a switch. One output from the switch is going to load_balancer_1 and the second output going to load_balancer_2.
Hello everybody ,,
i have a couples of questions ,as i always get help when i need from this great forum discussion ,
i'm going to implement mysql replication for the first time on two servers through master-to-master in active-passive mode
and i want to use a load balancer software with this replication system
this load balancing software have the ability to configure easily without making
I generally understand the problems that a load balancer poses for Kerberos. In fact, Microsoft's KB article outright states that it's not possible. However, this article - also on an MS site - suggests that there are possible workarounds.
Has anyone configured a system to use Kerberos and a load balancer? Did you need to use a Forefront server?
Email this page
