I have following code, which changes priority of current thread. I passed 90 as parameter, yet it looks like thread is running with priority 19. I have:
checked that ulimit -r is set to 99
process is running as root
How do I know that process is running with priority 19. I executed following command. As you can see pri is 19. Also what is the difference between rtprio and pri?
My question is pretty simple and is actually stated in the title.
Inside /etc/fstab file, in the sixth column, there is a number that corresponds to whether a filesystem should be scanned for errors. Possible values are:
0 - skip
1 - high priority
2 - low priority
The question: why was fsck 'priority' introduced in /etc/fstab?
Inside the /etc/fstab file, in the sixth column, there is a number that corresponds to whether a filesystem should be scanned for errors. Possible values are:
0 - skip
1 - high priority
2 - low priority
Why was fsck 'priority' introduced in /etc/fstab?
How does Priority Queue work. This is my scenario, I have certain objects with priorities 1,2,..10. There could be multiple objects with same priority. I was thinking I can put them into a priority queue and let the pool() give me the objects with highest priority.. ?
I m kinda confused with PQ.
1) I get errors when i create a PQ <MyClass>.
On my Ubuntu machine, in /etc/sysctl.conf file, I've got reverse path filtering options commented out by default like this:
#net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=1
#net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=1
but in /etc/sysctl.d/10-network-security.conf they are (again, by default) not commented out:
net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=1
So is reverse path filtering enabled or not?
I want to give Gnome-Shell the highest priority, but I couldn't change the priority on the System Monitor, an error messeage says: Can't change priority's process with pid 2841 to -5.
I'm tuning the nofile value in /etc/security/limits.conf for my oracle user and I have a question about its behavior: does nofile limit the total number of files the user can have open for all of its processes or does it limit the total number of files the user can have open for each of its processes?
Specifically, for the following usage:
oracle hard nofile
I'm using Keepalived to manage two Redis instances in a master/slave configuration. I'm experiencing a situation where, if Keepalived is terminated on the Master box (the one with the higher priority), the Backup server takes over as the master.
Email this page
