I'm trying the new "Storage Pools" feature on Windows Server 2012, and I've created several disks on the pool.
When I restart the server, some of the disks (two, out of four) do not attach automatically, and don't show up in the list of disks.
I can go to Server Manager > File and Storage Services > Storage Pools, and the faulty disks are listed with a yellow triangle beside them.
I currently only have remote access to this CentOS box, I need to move /var form the primary RAID to a new set of disks that was installed with more space, My current thoughts on how to accomplish this is to temporarily mount the new RAID to /tmp/var. rsync everything from /var to /temp/var then modify the fstab to point /var at the new disks.
Here is my question.
I have been tasked with determining if we should consider migrating from a Windows Server 2008 R2 server using windows shares to a Linux based file server using samba. We would still authenticate with AD running on Server 2008 R2 and most of our computers run Windows 7. The file servers vary in storage capacity and configuration, but the primary one runs three local 4 disk raid 5 shares.
I have a XenServer 5.6 Free setup with 5 VMs (Windows and Linux) using about 1.5TB of directly attached storage.
Because our virtualisation needs have grown a bit, we currently are preparing a faster XenServer 6.0 Free machine with more RAM and a more storage.
I'm trying to get a handle on the concepts and best practices of cloud development with Node.js, because I haven't found a good explanation.
When you buy a virtual machine from Rackspace or wherever, do you get SSH access and then you can run whatever you want within the limitations of your RAM/CPU allocations?
Can we run a MongoDB process in the same virtual machine as Node, or do we need to pu
I'm currently hosting a game server with the current specification
E1230
32GB Ram
2x 1Tb SATA
Windows 2008 server
SQL Server 2012
Databse size is 10Gb
Number of players 1k
The problem at first I had I/O bottleneck with 2x1Tb as I was using the default SQL configuration and all the files .mdf and .ldf were stored in default C:/SQLSERVER
Then I added 2 more 1 Tb disks and I isolated .mdf and .ldf
I,m facing difficulties in some issues if you guys can help me, I am using Windows Server 2003 for my File Server in these past days in DISK MANAGEMENT the status of two disks which are RAID 5 is (Fails Redundancy) but still the disks are working properly ,I'm afraid of losing my DATA , If You guys have any Idea about it share it please , THank you.
Hello everyone-
I'll cut right to the chase here. One of the disks in my RAID 0 array is showing bad sectors and is making bad noises. I believe that both disks are still in warranty, so I'm hoping to just get with the manufacturer and replace them(either of my laptop or of the disks, if MSI tells me to stuff it up my a-hh-- bum).
So, I have a Dell R710 with PERC 6/i Integrated and 6 450Gb Seagate 15k SAS disks in RAID10, I have 30 Xen vps working on it. Now I need to deploy second server with same hardware for same tasks and I want to figure out maybe it's a good idea to use RAID5 instead of RAID10 because we have a lot of "free" memory on first server and not so much "free space".
Email this page
