In this case I'm pretty sure it can't make a difference, but for future reference, pacman != yaourt. Your title says one thing, but your content says another.
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694
2013-01-29T00:44:09Z
And be sure you have done "pacman -Syu" first, or at the very least "pacman -Sy".Edit: my comment is probably not relevant if you made it up to this point of the install already - I assume you successfully installed other things like a bootloader. I suspect this is a networking issue. Can you ping the mirrors?
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id
?? I think I am missing something: every one of those entries says "... is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1" right?Why are you googling to figure our which package owns those files when pacman just told you?
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694
2012-07-16T12:01:32Z
`pacman -S linux-headers`
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694
2013-03-14T00:34:49Z
Don't forget that "sudo" essentially means "su do". If you can't get pacman functioning in your chroot, try using the "pacstrap" command (see beginner's guide) but use the argument "pacman" in place of "base" or "base-devel", then chroot. That will reinstall pacman for you.
adubschavy, you mark your own threads as solved, when you feel they are, by clicking "edit" on your first post which allows you to edit the title and prepend "[Solved]"
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694
2013-03-22T16:08:50Z
`pacman -S xf86-video-nouveau`
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694
2012-09-19T14:25:40Z
If you force the upgrade there's a good chance there WILL be something wrong with your system.What does pacman say owns those files? (pacman -Qo <filename>)
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694
2012-08-19T16:56:19Z
? First post it so we can see if it is properly done. Do the entries in it look similar to those two examples? If not it may need to be edited.
Trilby
https://bbs.archlinux.org/profile.php?id=54694
2012-06-24T23:36:46Z