I have found the fedora docs for building a kernel.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel
This guide assumed that I would build from a src.rpm. If I wanted to build 3.7 directly from kernel.org sources then what steps are missing from the guide or is there a better guide?
Hello,
As mentioned by the guide below, i am trying to build Linux kernel on my system.
I've built a kernel with loadable module support for various reasons, one of them the possibility to compile modules and load them without rebooting. This is supposed to be useful when I need a module that I had not enabled in the kernel config.
Now, with drivers like nouveau, it's as easy as going to the source directory, and running make M=drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau.
Hi,
I have to develop a driver for a custom FPGA we are developing. I'm cross compiling for an ARM processor (AT91SAM9G20 using uCLinux 2.6.30), but I think my question applies to Linux drivers generally.
I'm following to this guide: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel
But on this step rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` kernel.spec I get the following errors:
Code:
+ mv kernel-3.1.0-i686-PAE.config .config
++ head -1 .config
++ cut -b 3-
+ Arch=i386
+ make ARCH=i386 listnewconfig
+ grep -E '^CONFIG_'
.config:4658:warning: override: reassigning to symbol DEBUG_BLK_CGROU
Hi
Just a quick heads up on the progress of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Featur...rAccountDialog
Matthias Clasen, GTK maintainer has a update on his blog with the details
Hi All,
I am a Linux Person and I have good exposure in almost all Linux Flavours which ranges from Fedora, Ubuntu, Linux Mint etc. The problem that I face now is, On all Linux Flavour which uses Kernel Version 3.2 + I am not able to configure and use USB Modem - ZTE MG 880.
I want to add a particular new system call in the linux kernel 3.2.x but as a loadable kernel module.(as i don't want to recompile the kernel again and again)
I read through many posts on internet and also on SO, and got an impression that implementing System calls as a loadable module is not possible and some places it is said to be possible.
I am really confused now.
LunaVorax wrote:Why in the world can't this be simple?I actually tried what I posted before to make sure it works...But I can't really read the errors you posted since I don't speak that language...