This is more of a generic question, based on trying out Window Managers like Awesome, Mate and others.
To me looks like that other Window Managers like Gnome3 and/or Unity are heavy and pointless.
I do understand that having all the composed UIs is more pleasant for the eye, but apart that, what are the other major benefits?
To make an example, when I run the game Heroes of Newerth (using nVidia
I would like to change the icons displayed in window title bars:
The window icons appear to be unrelated to the icons used by launchers and docks, as they don't follow the ones defined in their respective .desktop files.
Many Window Managers are available in the Debian repos (or available to be built), and they can be easily installed to your #! machine. I have been WM hopping for a while now, and it occurred to me (with some encouragement) that others might find my experiences useful, or at least be able to build something useful from them.So to that end, I present 30 Window Managers in 30 days.
Are there any windows managers out there for Linux that offers the "metro" style window management that windows 8 offers?
Actually it's not just windows 8 that offers the style I'm looking for.
i am having two kvm hosts with same h/w and os,only difference is one host is tuned to use huge pages.
How can i compare which is performing better
I am planning to use some application that is more memory bound and compare its performance for a particular time.
Is there any memory usage simulator that serves similar function,i dont think stress can work in this way.can any one suggest a better
A look at two minimal Linux window managers whose emphasis is on running fast and light.
Hi all,
as per suggestion on Ask Ubuntu I've posted same question here in the forums:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/18315...gers-composers
Basically, what's the point of using many more resources to have snazzy window managers?
Any idea?
Cheers
LXer: "In the area of window managers Linux users are completely and totally spoiled rotten."
There are several discussions complaining high memory usage of PHP-FPM, without any practical approach to overcome. As I explored the problem with numerous tests, the problem is related to the age of PHP-FPM age.
Imagine we have pm.max_children = 10, and have a PHP script consuming 10M memory. One expects needing 100MB of MB. This is correct for the first 10 processes.