Note that the thread on the mailing list suggests that I can give it my own name:2) provide your own udev rule that applies a NAME to the interface. As long as this rule is ordered lexically before 80-net-name-slot.rules, then the upstream rule will have no effect.
Would this help?.SpecificallyI don't like this, how do I disable this?You basically have three options: You disable the assignment of fixed names, so that the unpredictable kernel names are used again.
Is it possible (and if so how) to tell udev to stop executing further rules for a certain device?
I know that there is an order/sequence of rules by the alphabetical naming of the udev files. Therefore it seems logical that earlier *.rules might want to prevent further (that is in the order later occuring rules) to be executed.